Menu
KBS Tour shafts vs. posted in Equipment Opinions: My very basic understanding is that the current Project X shaft is not exactly the same as the original Project X shaft. And also that the original creator, Kim Braly, created the KBS Tour shaft to improve on the Project X. I was in the store last yesterday talking with the guy at the repair desk.
0li
Active Member
- HCP
- 17.5
- Regional club/cóuntry
- Ennétsee, Switzerland
- Irons
- Mizuno MP53 G-4 / L4 2-3 / Testosterone levels5 56 amp; 52
- Driver
- Mizunó JPX 850
Proceeded to go through an demanding fitting yesterday and finally ended up with MP18 MMC and Project A LZ 5.5, which
offers 115 h.
The beliefs club head speed, basketball swiftness + dispersion have long been very best by far with this base and mind compared to Nippon Modus 105 R, KBS Trip 90 L and my own Nippon 950 Ur with MP 53 (which had been fitted finish 2010).
So I will become going from Nippon 950 to PX LZ 5.5. Afterwards at home I examine, that numerous people purchase the project Times shafts with a wrong, too difficult bend. I realized that 5.5 is definitely a Regular+ or firm flex and with my club head quickness of 76 mph with 6 iron, this could become a little bit too very much relating to concept. On top I realized that there will be a 5 - bend with 110 gary the gadget guy, which wasn't available during the fitted.
Would you simply rely on and proceed with what you possess been installed - or test the lighter bend 5.0 version?
Any encounters with this LZ base in respect of flex?
By the method - the MMC werde by significantly the greatest mind for me. Topped Hot Steel, 900 forged and AP2 by significantly. Second best was Erixon 565, which had been almost on my MP53 level.
Thanks for your feed-back/opinion.
offers 115 h.
The beliefs club head speed, basketball swiftness + dispersion have long been very best by far with this base and mind compared to Nippon Modus 105 R, KBS Trip 90 L and my own Nippon 950 Ur with MP 53 (which had been fitted finish 2010).
So I will become going from Nippon 950 to PX LZ 5.5. Afterwards at home I examine, that numerous people purchase the project Times shafts with a wrong, too difficult bend. I realized that 5.5 is definitely a Regular+ or firm flex and with my club head quickness of 76 mph with 6 iron, this could become a little bit too very much relating to concept. On top I realized that there will be a 5 - bend with 110 gary the gadget guy, which wasn't available during the fitted.
Would you simply rely on and proceed with what you possess been installed - or test the lighter bend 5.0 version?
Any encounters with this LZ base in respect of flex?
By the method - the MMC werde by significantly the greatest mind for me. Topped Hot Steel, 900 forged and AP2 by significantly. Second best was Erixon 565, which had been almost on my MP53 level.
Thanks for your feed-back/opinion.
My really basic understanding will be that the present Project X shaft is certainly not precisely the same as the authentic Project X base. And furthermore that the authentic inventor, Kim Braly, made the KBS Tour base to improve on the Task X.I was in the store last last night talking with the guy at the restoration desk. I've hit the Project Times and like thé 5.0. The man there had been displaying me the KBS Tour shaft (but only in a collection - they didn't have got either on hand).Right here are usually 2 items he told me that l hadn't heard before, so I'm expecting someone right here can verify or clarify, because when I searched online last night, I couldn't find anything related to this. One can be that the KBS Visit shaft has even more 'motion' (his term) in the suggestion - which I guess might mean that the Project X is more tip-stiff. He stated it has been associated to how they are usually constructed - something I haven't happen to be able to discover any details on, but probably because I can't remember the specific terminology he utilized (hey, my 4-yr-old girl has been with me, therefore I didn't capture.everything. he stated - LOL). It has been something associated to the amount of metal used in the suggestion for balance vs. making it stiffer. The 2nd state, and this could become related to the initial, is that the Task Times amp; the KBS Visit play to slightly various flexes. He recommended the KBS Trip in a 5.5 bend as similar to the Project X.A few points of referrals: I possess performed Hogan irons for a long period and possess always played the Apex 4 base. That is what they specify as 'tough,' but I believe that the common consensus will be that it usually plays a little softer than additional tough shafts. My driver SS is definitely generally around the low 100s. My 150-lawn club can be a stock 7-iron. Decent speed, more of a swingér than a batter. In the last when I have got tried some other shafts, l didn't Iike the DG S300 - felt like I never ever loaded it correctly. Nevertheless, I lately strike some irons with DG Ur300 shafts at a demo time, and actually like that. Does that info all appear to coincide with the Task A in 5.0 or the KBS Visit in 5.5 flex?Any additional input, information, or suggestions would be appreciated. Thanks a lot.
![Project Project](/uploads/1/2/5/7/125799677/317727138.png)